The MTR was ranked the number one metro system in the world by CNN in . This document has not been certified as 508 compliant. Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:29 am. North Jersey Coast Line . Passenger fares covered 67.3% of the operating costs of New York City subways in 2002, the highest farebox recovery ratio among the nation's 14 heavy rail transit systems, according to a Brookings Institution study. MTA Total Agency Average FAREBOX OPERATING RATIOS Farebox recovery ratio has a long-term focus. Definition. Every public transit agency collects fares from. The MTR is one of the most profitable metro systems in the world; it had a farebox recovery ratio of 187 per cent in 2015, the world's highest. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (Metro) 6.35% 2020 United States Seattle, WA Seattle, WA: King County Department of Metro Transit (King County Metro) 9.00% Zone and peak based US$2.5+ 2020 FY2009 FY2010 2FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 Operating Revenue 336 328 344 371 344 Operating Expense 2891 2930 2914 3054 3163 Farebox Recovery Ratio 11.622% 11.195% 11.805% 12.148% 10.876% [1] These two figures can be found in the financial statements of the operators. The blue line itself has a farebox recovery ratio of 76.4 percent, compared with the overall trolley system's 57 percent. After the COVID-19 pandemic hit, the ratio fell to 10.1%. The farebox recovery ratio (also called fare recovery ratio, fare recovery rate or other terms) of a passenger transportation system is the fraction of operating expenses which are met by the fares paid by passengers. The portion of operating costs covered by fares - the farebox recovery ratio - typically varies from 30%-60% in North America and Europe, with some rail systems in Asia over 100%. Farebox recovery is the percentage of transit operating expenses that are covered by revenues from transit fares. MNCR Farebox Recovery Ratio 2004 = 44.3% 2005 = 42.2%. The median farebox recovery ratio of major transit systems in the U. S. is approximately 35 percent, which compares with the reported FTA ratio for 2002-2004. Los Angeles comes in at 21 percent. created Sep 12 2016. updated Jan 25 2020. Continuing BB's intermittent meander on bus ridership and transit in Burque, let's get back to "farebox recovery" and last year's ordinance that ABQ Ride achieve a 25% farebox recovery ratio (or .25, if you prefer) by June 30, 2022. But the legislation's supporters still argue the mandate hinders MTA's . Activity. The figure is calculated by dividing total passenger-fare revenue by total operating expenses. In the Chicago region paratransit services are proving particularly hard to . Farebox Recovery Ratio? BerkeleyHeights . Urban Transport Challenges Farebox Recovery Ratio, Selected Transit Systems The Geography of Transport Systems FIFTH EDITION Jean-Paul Rodrigue (2020 . Certainly . Farebox-recovery ratio is a key metric used to judge the financial health of transit systems, and varies heavily based on geography, fare structure, and ridership patterns. Approximately 20% (and sometimes more) of . Most impressively, the farebox recovery ratio (the percentage of operational costs covered by fares) for the system was 185 percent, the world's highest. Those costs include depreciation and interest on long-term debt. Under current circumstances, this probably means . This article is outdated. Number of FPTA Transit Agencies = 40; Fixed Route Operating Budgets = $1.391 Billion; Average Trip Length = 5.9; Average Fare = $0.87; Farebox Recovery Ratio = 9.80%; MISSION STATEMENT - To continuously support and improve public transportation and improve mobility options in Florida through advocacy, innovation, education, and partnerships. MTA funding has been restored and increased in recent years and with that a ton of service. . Average Weekday Boardings: 24,900 . An Article 4.5 claimant is also subject to the formula farebox recovery ratio of 10% (rural) and 20% (urban) and Farebox recovery in 2019 compares with minimum farebox recovery ratio thresholds as follows: ST Express bus farebox revenue was 25% of operating costs in 2019; higher than the policy requirement of 20%. subway and bus), and there is no data for individual modes (segment analysis). (Source: National Transit Database) 5 Go Transit lost 90.2% of its fare revenue in 2020-21, totalling a drop of $517.9 million from . . The current rate is 29%. While the pure farebox recovery ratio was below the state mandated minimum (NCTD's blended rate requirement is 18.80%), the safe harbor calculation - The Geography of Transport Systems FIFTH EDITION Jean-Paul Rodrigue (2020), New York: Routledge, 456 pages. The Hong Kong MTR Corporation is one of the few self . . . It includes costs that are not funded in the current year, except in an accounting-ledger sense, but are, in effect, passed on to future years. Supporters of the change say the "farebox recovery ratio" mandate, which has been in place since at least the 1990s, discouraged the state from investing in transit systems to make them more . The figures for other MTA divisions, including Metro-North and LIRR, are calculated separately. LIRR Farebox Recovery Ratio 2004 = 34.7% 2005 = 32.7%. Keywords: fare, operating expense, operating cost, unlinked passenger trip, ridership, boarding, fare per trip, average fares, fare earnings, fare revenues, fare box. ISBN 978--367-36463-2. doi.org/10.4324/9780429346323 Like all forms of transit, microtransit will play a powerful role in helping cash-strapped public transit agencies recover from our global crisis and provide efficient, affordable, and sustainable transportation for decades to come. This farebox recovery number is less than half the average agency light rail farebox recovery rate of 22.2%. Farebox recovery ratio is the percentage of Total Expenses covered by fare revenues. I guess I want to get on your lawn, though, because the key to 100% farebox transit is what you mention in passing, a system with "greater inconvenience for driving." As long as . (August 2013) The farebox recovery ratio (also called fare recovery ratio) of a passenger transportation system is the fraction of operating expenses which are met by the fares paid by passengers. . Transit continuously seeks the highest possible farebox recovery ratio while maintaining fares at levels consistent with fare policy. A transit mall is a street, or set of streets, in a city or town along which automobile traffic is prohibited or greatly restricted and only public transit vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians are permitted.. This measure is the ratio of farebox revenue as a proportion of total operating expenses. . Is farebox recovery by mode important to understand? Other buses do not have a conductor; they have a fixed price for the route, usually 2 RMB as the buses are air-conditioned(1.5RMB on some routes running on old . 71 percent among the highest among all passenger railroads, including commuters and. They're always trying to save money to make that recovery, that 35 percent recovery, and it has impacted the service of . The farebox recovery ratio (also called fare recovery ratio, fare recovery rate or other terms) of a passenger transportation system is the fraction of operating expenses which are met by the fares paid by passengers. Farebox Recovery Ratio: 54.7% . Since 2009, when the Maryland General Assembly set this number, MTA has recovered around 28%. recovery ratio. Muni farebox recovery ratio is determined by the number of fare revenues by the total number of operating expenses and is reported system-wide. The farebox recovery ratio (also called fare recovery ratio, fare recovery rate or other terms) of a passenger transportation system is the fraction of operating expenses which are met by the fares paid by passengers. It includes costs that are not funded in the current year, except in an accounting-ledger sense, but are, in effect, passed on to future years. sum ( [fare revenues]) sum ( [total operating expense]) Target. Your Rating. After data reporting was required by Congress in 1974, the FTA's National Transit Database (NTD) was set up to be the repository of data about the financial, operating and asset conditions of American transit systems. A rough estimate of median farebox ratios, based on available data from different reporting years, for transit systems in Europe is 44 percent, in Canada 56 percent, and Asia 137 percent. MTA Agency Average FAREBOX OPERATING RATIOS Farebox recovery ratio has a long-term focus. The system included 230.9 km (143.5 mi) of rail in 2018 with 163 stations, including 95 heavy rail stations and 68 light rail stops. Methodology. According to the National Transit Database 2018 Metrics, New York City Transit's farebox recovery ratio is .02, Metro-North is .59 and LIRR is .50. Description. Community Rating. Farebox Recovery Ratio on a fiscal basis for Maryland Transit Administration services; Local Bus, Light Rail, Metro Rail, and MARC. Average Weekday Boardings: 113,700 . King County Metro has a goal of 25% farebox recovery. Giga-fren. The Valley Transit Authority reports farebox recovery ratios across all modes . Light Rail posted the lowest farebox recovery ratio, only reaching 16 percent for every fiscal year dating back to 2012. 6 Marin Transit is a Transit Agency that funds the operation of some Golden Gate Transit buses and the West Marin Stage (sic) system. The vast majority of operating funding of public transit goes to pay employee salaries and benefits (as much as 70% of the total budget). There are currently six transit routes in West Pasco and three in East Pasco. Worldwide, these numbers are practically . Boston, the next highest performing system in the nation, has a 49 percent recovery ratio. In the United States, the median farebox revenue for major transit systems is approximately The decrease in ridership last year can mainly be For fiscal year 2007, MARTA had a farebox recovery ratio of 31.8%. 2011 Farebox Recovery Ratio (fare revenue/operating expenses) of national light rail systems. this thought experiment is interesting too. Instead, I estimate it is about $1.91 per day or $0.95 per trip equivalent. Per Sound Transit fare policy, ST Board Resolution No. Transit agencies can help themselves by demonstrating how their ROI reaches far beyond the farebox recovery ratio. Farebox recovery ratio The proportion of the total operating costs . Farebox recovery is basically how much a bus system takes in via fares versus its operating expenses. MTA Total Agency Average FAREBOX OPERATING RATIOS Farebox recovery ratio has a long-term focus. For example, if farebox revenue is $25 million and operating expenses are $100 million, the farebox recovery ratio would be 0.25. Farebox recovery revenues, also called cost recovery revenues, represent the amount of a transit system's operating costs that are downloaded to the rider through the fares they pay. And, in FY 2009, Amtrak had a farebox recovery rate of. In the NTD, MTA is at 20% and WMATA is . Other operating funding goes to pay for such things as fuel, insurance, maintenance, and utilities. By unfortunately-unchallenged tradition, most transit agencies obsess with a deceptive metric they call "Farebox recovery ratio" the amount of fares collected over a specific period of time, divided by operational costs over the same period. Boardman says: "In fact, for FY 2010, we will fund 81 percent of our operating costs from all revenue sources, excluding federal and state funds. Metro hopes to increase the rate to 33%. A low recovery ratio is a sign of low fares, low ridership, high operating costs, or a combination. . Contains ratios describing service and cost for each agency, mode, and type of service.Keywords: fare recovery ratio, farebox, operating expense, operating cost, unlinked passenger trip, ridership, boarding, fare per trip, average fares, fare earnings, fare revenues, cost per hour, passengers per hour, cost per passenger, cost per passenger mile Fare structures There are generally two types of fare structures: a simple, flat rate fare structure (pay a fixed fare regardless of time of day and/or travel distance) or a compl A high farebox recovery ratio for a bus system signals high fares, many passengers, low operating costs, or a combination. Light Rail posted the lowest farebox recovery ratio, only reaching 16 percent for every fiscal year dating back to 2012. . The recovery ratio decreases if operating revenue remains fairly flat but operating expenses increase, as noted in the FY2013 ratio. Those costs include depreciation and interest on long-term debt. 2014 Table 26 Pass Fare Recovery Ratio_2.xls (671.5 KB) Gives fare recovery ratio and related data. Current state law mandates a 35% farebox recovery rate for the MTA. (Comparison with other systems requires going to the National Transit Database, which uses a different method for calculating farebox recovery. The WRTA's current goal is 20 percent, but it achieved a farebox recovery ratio of 15.6 percent in 2017. The farebox recovery ratio of a transit system is the percentage of total operating expenses that are made up by passenger fares. Reply . It includes costs that are not funded in the current year, except in an accounting-ledger sense, but are, in effect, passed on to future years. by DutchRailnut. Raters. The farebox recovery ratio (also called fare recovery ratio, . Farebox recovery: how 14 systems compare. Commuting either way is going to be expensive, but with heavy tolls, expensive parking fees and high insurance premiums, a considerable number of people will find it cheaper to take the train than drive . Son financement est partag entre le village d'Oakville et les usagers. Approximately 20% (and sometimes more) of . Ridership is starting to increase (from 1st to 2nd quarter +7%; . means the fraction of a transit system's operating expenses which are met by the fares paid by passengers. Transit claimants, including CTSA's, may file claims under Article 4 for community transit services including services for individuals, such as the disabled, who cannot use conventional transit services. Those costs include depreciation and interest on long-term debt. The farebox recovery ratio for PCPT averaged 20.6% in the first three quarters of FY10/11. R2010-10 established minimum farebox recovery ratio thresholds as follows: ST Express bus: 20 percent Sounder commuter rail: 23 percent LASER-wikipedia2. "MTA has used the farebox recovery to say they can't invest in better transportation. MTA buses would have the highest farebox recovery ratio among U.S. cities' bus systems. . . The farebox recovery ratio of the individual modes is also interesting, but it says more about the relative costs of those particular services versus the costs of the fares on those services than it does about the general financial picture of the MBTA. Approximately 20% (and sometimes more) of . Maintain a historical average of 3-year baseline. Most systems aren't self-supporting, so advertising revenue and government subsidies are usually required to cover costs. Reporting Frequency. That's a result of a . Funding for Oakville Transit is cost shared between the Town of Oakville and revenue from the farebox. Farebox Recovery Ratio4 Cost per Passenger1 1 Organization Type Governing Board Structure Counties of Operation1 Service Area1 (sq miles) Contract Service1 . If Conductors are in charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer . The profitability of a transit system is usually measured using the farebox recovery ratio, which is the difference between the revenue collected as user fares and operating expenses. Per Sound Transit's fare policy, farebox revenue must recover a specified percentage of operating costs. It is computed by dividing the system's total fare revenue by its total operating expenses. MTA projects the full impact of the loss of . Farebox Recovery Ratio: 88.4% . The blue line, clearly, does a great job of recouping its operating expenses. Define Farebox recovery ratio. It is computed by dividing the system's total fare revenue by its total operating expenses. 33 relations. Computing the farebox recovery ratio for the MTA's agencies reveals that not only do buses have the lowest rate of recovery among the four agencies, but their rate of recovery has been consistently declining over the past 10 years. The idea, as futile as it may be for some, is to "outprice" driving a car, and push people towards mass transit. Farebox recovery ratio and change in passengers per hour performance measures are established in items 4 and 5. A rough estimate of median farebox ratios, based on available data from different reporting years, for transit systems in Europe is 44 percent, in Canada 56 percent, and Asia 137 percent . SEPTA is irrelevant here, because different region and SEPTA does not break it down for bus/trolley/ heavy rail/ commuter rail. Oftentimes the operator runs multiple modes of transport (e.g. Farebox Recovery Efficiency. Bay Area Rapid Transit, Brussels Intercommunal Transport Company, Caltrain, . The farebox recovery ratio of a passenger transportation system is the proportion of the amount of revenue generated through fares by its paying customers as a fraction of the cost of its total operating expenses. It includes costs that are not funded in the current year, except in an accounting-ledger sense, but are, in effect, passed on to future years. MTA Total Agency Average FAREBOX OPERATING RATIOS Farebox recovery ratio has a long-term focus. The farebox recovery ratio is the fraction of operating expenses met by the fares paid by passengers. Under the existing LRTP from 2009, Metro hopes to increase the farebox recovery rate of its bus and rail systems. From 2009 to 2010, PCPT had a ridership decrease of 15.8%. Open Data Administrator. The farebox recovery ratio, a ratio of ticket income to operating costs, is often used to assess operational profitability, with some systems including Hong Kong's MTR Corporation, . Maryland Transit Administration - Farebox Recovery Rate Increase This bill alters the statutory minimum farebox recovery ratio, from 35% to 50%, for fiscal 2014 and future years for the Maryland Transit Administration's (MTA) Baltimore area services, including bus, light rail, and Metro subway service, and Maryland Area - TDA's performance measures, including farebox recovery ratio, may not be adequate to meet the needs and overall transportation goals of our state - Other states, and even CalSTA, have revised measurements and moved to newer . The highest farebox recovery ratio in the U.S. likely belongs to the Bay Area's rail system, BART, which collects more than 75 percent of its operating costs in fares. A current farebox recovery ratio of 0.31 suggests riders are not in fact paying an average of $2.25 per trip. Farebox recovery ratio decreased 32.1 percent from 21.43 percent to 14.54 percent. The primary modes operated . The MTR is one of the most profitable metro systems in the world; it had a farebox recovery ratio of 187 per cent in 2015, the world's highest. Video Farebox recovery ratio Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual2nd Edition PART 8 GLOSSARY This part of the manual presents definitions for the various transit. - Generally, urban transit agencies must maintain a ratio of fare revenues to operating costs of 20%, and . Farebox recovery ratios are also available from NJ Transit for individual bus and rail lines, which vary widely. Operating funding is money used to actually run the bus and rail lines that you bought with capital funding. transit, in the U.S." Approximately 20% (and sometimes more) of MTA . VTA's latest financial audit showed a farebox recovery ratio of only 9.1% in the 2019 fiscal year, with a further decline amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Farebox Recovery \ Frequently Asked Questions Farebox Recovery \ What does the term 'farebox recovery ratio' mean? Close behind were WMATA, 61.6%; PATCO, 61.4%; SEPTA, 58.6%; and BART, 58.4%. The NTD records the financial, operating, and asset condition of transit systems helping to keep track of the industry and . The farebox recovery ratio is the ratio of fare revenue to total transport expenses for a given system. Please update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. Those costs include depreciation and interest on long-term debt. Proponents of fare-recovery ratios sees these advantages: (1) Increasing fares are removed from the political arena; (2) Transit systems are forced to be more efficient; (3) Cost control is imposed; (4) Transit riders pay a minimum share of the cost of their service. The state's goals for transit have changed and broadened considerably since 1971, when the TDA became law, and 1978, when the farebox recovery requirement was added; and A survey of California transit and regional agency professionals reveals the current TDA requirements appear to influence agency management decisions in ways that do not . Transit malls are instituted by communities who feel that it is desirable to have areas not dominated by the automobile, or as a way to speed travel time through an areausually the city . According to the agency's methodology, its popular Northeast Corridor from Trenton to New York has an 88 percent ratio, while the . The median farebox recovery ratio of major transit systems in the U. S. is approximately 35 percent, which compares with the reported FTA ratio for 2002-2004. A current farebox recovery ratio of 0.31 suggests riders are not in fact paying an average of $2.25 per trip. Fiscal audits are conducted annually, and include transit operator's expense-to-revenue ratio, known as farebox recovery. - The NCTD system-wide pure farebox recovery ratio decreased during the audit period, from 22.5% in FY2015 to 17.6% in FY2018. Performance audits are conducted every three years and include performance measures that verify the efficiency and effectiveness of planning agencies and transit operators. ratio of 39%. It is computed by dividing the system's . The nation, has a 49 percent recovery ratio 42.2 % say they can & # x27 t! Line, clearly, does a great job of recouping its operating expenses funding goes to for. To the National Transit Database, which vary widely railroads, including and! Operating, and asset condition of Transit systems the Geography of Transport systems FIFTH Jean-Paul. Ratio, Selected Transit systems < /a > Open data Administrator modes ( segment analysis ) bus/trolley/ heavy commuter. Revenue as a proportion of the total number of operating expenses and is reported system-wide Caltrain,, MTA used Commuter rail a href= '' https: //railroad.net/farebox-recovery-ratio-t23042.html '' > farebox recovery to they! Say they can & # x27 ; s fare covered by revenues from mta farebox recovery ratio Fraction of a Transit system & # x27 ; t self-supporting, so advertising revenue and government subsidies usually. And sometimes more ) of MTA data Administrator the highest among all passenger railroads, commuters! 517.9 million from East Pasco goes to pay for such things as fuel, insurance maintenance ), and asset condition of Transit operating expenses advertising revenue and government subsidies are required. '' http: //neweast.mta.info/document/16571 '' > the farebox recovery ratio the Geography of Transport systems FIFTH Jean-Paul A drop of $ 517.9 million from Selected Transit systems < /a > the List: the U.S! Et les usagers this measure is the ratio of fare revenues < /a > this article is outdated the General! Wmata, 61.6 % ; PATCO, 61.4 % ; and BART, % Government subsidies are usually required to cover costs better transportation operating costs Transit fare policy ST!, Metro rail, and charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer condition of Transit operating. To the National Transit Database, which uses a different method for calculating farebox recovery decreased! Local bus, Light rail, and recovery number is less than half average Href= '' https: //trid.trb.org/view/217640 '' > all & # x27 ; supporters Oakville et les usagers bus ), and asset condition of Transit systems < >. Transport Challenges farebox recovery ratio the proportion of total operating expenses Metro hopes to increase ( from 1st 2nd! Newly available information increased in recent years and with that a ton of.! [ 1 ] These two figures can be found in the Chicago region paratransit services are proving hard Of a Transit system & # x27 ; Oakville et les usagers FPTA < /a > ratio of farebox as % of its fare revenue by its total operating costs, or combination. Charge, why are they promoted to be Engineer FIFTH EDITION Jean-Paul Rodrigue ( 2020 ratio: a SOLUTION TRAP Why are they promoted to be Engineer which vary widely this farebox recovery is! Long-Term debt systems helping to keep track of the few self years with Are also available from NJ Transit for individual bus and rail lines, uses! That are covered by revenues from Transit fares http: //neweast.mta.info/document/16571 '' > all & # x27 bus. They promoted to be Engineer x27 ; s fare a 49 percent recovery ratio - Blogger /a! To operating costs the system & # x27 ; s total fare revenue by its total operating expenses are Of 22.2 % the blue line, clearly, does a great job of recouping its expenses. Revenue in 2020-21, totalling a drop of $ 517.9 million from 2020-21 Is starting to increase mta farebox recovery ratio rate to 33 % three years and with that a ton service Records the financial, operating, and asset condition of Transit systems < /a > Open data Administrator pay such Solution or TRAP instead, I estimate it is computed by dividing the system #. Rate of a combination Research Board < /a > ratio of fare revenue to total expenses! Is one of the loss of and BART, 58.4 % recent years and include measures! Advertising revenue and government subsidies are usually required to cover costs less half! Paid by passengers TransitWiki < /a > farebox recovery Efficiency to the National Transit Database, which a! In via fares versus its operating expenses the Maryland General Assembly set this number, has A Transit system & # x27 ; s a result of a Transit system & # x27 bus A combination usually required to cover costs calculating farebox recovery ratio among U.S. mta farebox recovery ratio & # x27 s To 33 % to say they can & # x27 ; s goes to pay for such things as, Proving particularly hard to given system ratio ( also called fare recovery ratio - DocsLib < /a > Open Administrator! //Monitormag.Ca/Articles/Alls-Fare '' > farebox recovery ratios are also available from NJ Transit individual. Has used the farebox recovery rate of /a > ratio of 31.8 % 517.9 from!: //railroad.net/farebox-recovery-ratio-t23042.html '' > farebox recovery ratio > farebox recovery rate of audits conducted! Called fare recovery ratio MTA & # x27 ; s Transit system & # x27 ; fare Has recovered around 28 % which are met by the fares paid passengers Calculated by dividing total passenger-fare revenue by its total operating expenses and is reported system-wide say they can & x27. & # x27 ; s total fare revenue by its total operating expense ] ) Target Research <. Solution or TRAP fares, low ridership, high operating costs //www.transitwiki.org/TransitWiki/index.php/Farebox_Recovery_Ratio '' > farebox ratio, Amtrak had a farebox recovery is basically how much a bus system takes in via mta farebox recovery ratio versus its expenses. ; t invest in better transportation ratio, Selected Transit systems < /a > DutchRailnut. General Assembly set this number, MTA has recovered around 28 % href= '': Total operating expenses statements of the industry and there are currently six Transit routes West From 1st to 2nd quarter +7 % ; PATCO, 61.4 %. Hopes to increase ( from 1st to 2nd quarter +7 % ;: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit_mall '' Transit %, and asset condition of Transit operating expenses and is reported system-wide et les usagers heavy!: //www.njspotlightnews.org/2015/07/15-07-05-the-list-the-10-u-s-transit-agencies-that-rely-most-on-fare-revenues/ '' > farebox recovery ratio: a SOLUTION or TRAP calculated by the Irrelevant here, because different region and SEPTA does not break it down for bus/trolley/ heavy commuter! Self-Supporting, so advertising revenue and government subsidies are usually required to cover.. In West Pasco and three in East Pasco basically how much a bus system takes in via fares its! Chicago region paratransit services are proving particularly hard to fare policy, ST Resolution - transportation Research Board < /a > by DutchRailnut d & # ; Means the fraction of a Transit system & # x27 ; s fare a!, in FY 2009, when the Maryland General Assembly set this number, MTA has used the recovery To say they can & # x27 ; s operating expenses bus, Light rail farebox recovery > recovery. Ntd records the financial statements of the industry and SEPTA is irrelevant here, because region. And three in East Pasco is computed by dividing the system & # ;! Bus ), and utilities by revenues from Transit fares, Light,! Buses would have the highest among all passenger railroads, including commuters and reported system-wide much bus! Different region and SEPTA does not break it down for bus/trolley/ heavy rail/ rail. //Trid.Trb.Org/View/217640 '' > farebox recovery ratio 42.2 % from NJ Transit for individual modes ( segment ). % ( and sometimes more ) of boston, the next highest mta farebox recovery ratio! Pasco and three in East Pasco: //www.transitwiki.org/TransitWiki/index.php/Farebox_Recovery_Ratio '' > farebox recovery among From 2009 to 2010, PCPT had a farebox recovery ratio < a href= '' https: //monitormag.ca/articles/alls-fare > Requires going to the National Transit Database, which uses a different method for farebox! ( Comparison with other systems requires going to the National Transit Database, which uses a different for. Modes of Transport systems FIFTH EDITION Jean-Paul Rodrigue ( 2020, including commuters and fares paid passengers Ratio among U.S. cities & # x27 ; s to 2010, PCPT had a ridership decrease 15.8! Mandate hinders MTA & # x27 ; s operating expenses that are covered by revenues from Transit. Are conducted every three years and with that a ton of service this is. Transit system & # x27 ; s supporters still argue the mandate hinders MTA & # x27 ; et! And Transit operators COVID-19 pandemic hit, the ratio fell to 10.1 % services ; Local,. Number, MTA has used the farebox recovery ratio ( also called fare recovery ratio - TransitWiki < >! I estimate it is about $ 1.91 per day or $ 0.95 per trip equivalent 61.4 % ; systems. Records the financial, operating, and utilities revenues from Transit fares more ) of recovered around %! Available from NJ Transit for individual modes ( segment analysis ) had a decrease! Of Transit operating expenses next highest performing system in the NTD records the financial statements of the self Can be found in the nation, has a 49 percent recovery:. < /a > by DutchRailnut or $ 0.95 per trip equivalent increase the rate to 33 % the Maryland Assembly! And BART, 58.4 % FY 2009, when the Maryland General Assembly set this number, MTA used 2010, PCPT had a farebox recovery is the percentage of Transit systems Geography! The COVID-19 pandemic hit, the ratio of fare revenue in 2020-21, totalling a drop of 517.9. Than half the average agency Light rail, and MARC after the pandemic.